Monday, October 30, 2006

Yesterday's Bush Lies with Neo-Con Comment

From Bush yesterday via Atrios:

My attitude about our – look, I'm into campaigning out there: People want to know, can you win? That's what they want to know. I mean, there's – look, there's some 25 percent or so that want us to get out, shouldn't have been out there in the first place – and that's fine. They're wrong. But you can understand why they feel that way. They just don't believe in war, and – at any cost. I believe when you get attacked and somebody declares war on you, you fight back. And that's what we're doing.


He lies every time he talks. Now he has Iraq attacking the U.S. What a wanker.

Notice once again how devious the lie is. "...some 25% want us to get out..." get out of where? Iraq of course. Then comes the money part of the lie..."I believe when you get attacked...". Also remember how the Chimp said recently his biggest frustration was not being able to connect Iraq with the war on terror. This is clearly another feeble attempt.

In spite of the clear deceitfulness by the Leader, here's a commenters response to the above:

"I didn't see anything in that quote about Iraq."

And you know me, nothing but kindness when challenged.

"You wouldn't see anything in that quote about Iraq. You know why you can't see it? You still have those neo-con glasses on. The neo-con glasses.....I don't know if you know this......filter out what is known to many, many, people in America(some 63%, last count) as "reality". And furthermore, did you know that true neo-cons must filter "reality" because "reality" burns them. You know how neo-cons "stupid" burns me? Well, it's the same way with "reality" for neo-cons.

So here is my recommendation. If you will remove your neo-con eyeware for 1 hour the first day, then 2 hours the second and......this isn't confusing you, is it?.....then 3 hours the third and so forth and so on. Results may vary, but if you will follow this plan, it won't be too long before you too can understand the Chimps' speeches."

Think I was too mean?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home