Sunday, July 02, 2006

Travel Time Terrorists

Wow. Man. The New York Times. What are they up to now? Well, thanks for asking.
Everyone knows by now that the Times revealed nothing new in their bank transaction story which other newspapers also covered. That didn't keep the president, many congressional members and of course the usual suspect wingnut media and blogger personnel from calling for the Times Regime to be unilaterally invaded, occupied and imprisoned for their treasonous work. One of the silliest(but what did you expect?)name calling was tagging the Grey Lady as al-NYTimes or just al-Times. Similar to the nuts approach to the man who won the popular vote in 2000, Al Gore. His name is designated by the tin foil hat wearers as al-Gore. Get it? Ha, freaking ha. This is done because every wingnut knows for a fact that the Times as well as Al Gore are not so secretly working on the side of al Qaeda.

With that short background of where we are, it won't surprise anyone but, my goodness gracious sake, the latest from Nutland is silly and yet so sad. I'm referring to the accusation by Michelle Malkin, (that lovely, tolerant writer and media "personality") that now the N.Y.Times is aiding and abetting the terrorists by leaking important information in their...wait for it...Travel section. Yep. The Travel section article is here
To be brief, The Times Travel section featured the small village of St. Michaels in eastern Maryland where both Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld have vacation homes. Naturally if the Times printed this it wasn't merely a Travel section article about travel and the lifestyles of the rich and famous. No, no.
One of the reasons the Times printed this, according to Malkin is:

"And because al Qaeda already must have an inkling that Rumsfeld and Cheney live somewhere in the greater Washington, D.C. area, right? So what's the harm in handing them all the details, right?"

And then David Horowitz,another tolerant wingnut, takes it further:

"The NY Times points cranks, radicals, al-Qaeda operatives and would be assassins to the summer homes of Cheney and Rumsfeld"

Then, Horowitz describes the "real" war and who's responsible for it:

"Make no mistake about it, there is a war going on in this country. The aggressors in this war are Democrats, liberals and leftists who began a scorched earth campaign against President Bush before the initiation of hostilities in Iraq.

The initiators of this war were Al Gore and Jimmy Carter who attacked the president's attempt to rally the world against Saddam's defiance of international law in September 2002 just after his appeal to the UN General Assembly."


Good stuff, no? Well, the implications are far reaching. I don't believe anyone will be able to read the paper any longer without detecting the allegiance to al-Qaeda in ALL it's pages. I recommend a thorough daily review of the sports section as well as the comics. The classifieds are, of course, suspect. In addition, stock quotes in the business section can no longer be viewed as merely stock quotes. If the Times prints ball scores, stock quotes, or comic strips, I now know they are sending clandestine messages to the enemy. Secret code. The kind of code that only tin foil hat wearers can decipher when they tilt the foil in just the proper way to reflect the light. Michelle Malkin, David Horowitz and tin foil hat wearers everwhere I salute you for once again pointing out the dangers in our midst.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home