Thoughts About the Clinton's
It is fairly common knowledge that a good sized group of conservatives(that's what they call themselves) don't really care much about Bill and Hillary Clinton. Yes, yes I know, an understatement, but I want to look as objectively as a commie,anti-Christian, anti-Israel, terrorist loving, God-hater can...oh I forgot, moron, too.
Why would Republicans detest the Clinton's so much? The Clinton's were not only swiftboated but swiftboated with the whole swiftboat fleet for 8 straight years until 2001 when Bill left office and 5 more years since, while Bill is out of office and Hillary has been a N. York senator. I think it could be considered a swiftboat war.Why that kind of concentration? What is it?
Now, it has been said that Bill's nasty habits with willing women is the reason. You know the routine. What about the children? Oral sex. Adultery. What about the children?
Washington D.C. has had plenty of great sexcapade stories to go around, lots of Republicans and some Democrats doing all manner of acts prohibited by Judeo-Christian law. I mean, come on now, Karl Rove used a male homosexual prostitute, Jeff Gannon, who was pretending to be a White House correspondent. So the idea that Bill is nasty as the justification for such vitriol is not credible.
Well, what about their policies, you know, what they stand for? Could that be the reason for all the attacks on them? My observation is that many politicians in and around D.C. hold similar views as the Clintons. Bill and Hillary's political viewpoints are pretty mainstream, so I don't think that's it.
What is unique about this couple? And what is unique about this couple about which, Republicans are afraid, at least politically? I mean, Karl can destroy just about anybody, Max Cleland, a triple amputee, John Kerry, a true Democratic statesman patriot, John Murtha, the closest throwback U.S. military patriot ever, and on and on, but why the extra for the Clinton's?
Consider: Hasn't the current Bush crime element demonstrated their control of information and the media? You know, paying newspaper columnists and others to get favorable press and of course my all time favorite, "embedding" the journalists with the military in Iraq. Really objective huh? And you know what goes on when the word embedding is the verb? Think about it. Could there have been an incestous relationship with our military(read executive branch) that produced DNA challenged offspring news columns that just weren't quite right? But I digress. Point being from all apparent evidence and political history, the Republican disinformation and echo chamber media campaign hasn't met with much resistance. The media has not been a match for Rove. He 's controlled the narrative in main medialand for at least 6 years.
I said all that to say this: Bill and Hillary are rock star politicians and the media cannot and will not refuse to cover them. Karl will not be able to dictate the news narrative as well. The media, I suggest, just like they act with all other celebrities, will continually cover Bill and Hillary. Bill and Hillary on TV are perfect, they are camera friendly and believable, credible. They make good TV content. Content is all the rage. And in this fantasy TV land we are currently in, the Clinton's come off as your friends. And here's the kicker, the media likes the Clinton's. The media hated Al Gore and never really tried much with Kerry, but the Clinton's, they are not only liked but admired by media. What's a Karl Rove to do? His campaign has been a steady drumbeat of slander, hyperbole, outright lies,dirty tricks and who knows what the fuck else for 15 years all because Rover knows his normal good time buddies, the bosses in media CEO-land,normally dependable echo chamber syncophants for conservative causes will not be able to resist covering the Clinton's,and the Clinton's will help shape the narrative. This is the real reason for the swiftboat fleet sailing into battle for 15 years. The Republicans are scared to political death over the most popular political couple ever. 08 is gonna' be something to behold.
Why would Republicans detest the Clinton's so much? The Clinton's were not only swiftboated but swiftboated with the whole swiftboat fleet for 8 straight years until 2001 when Bill left office and 5 more years since, while Bill is out of office and Hillary has been a N. York senator. I think it could be considered a swiftboat war.Why that kind of concentration? What is it?
Now, it has been said that Bill's nasty habits with willing women is the reason. You know the routine. What about the children? Oral sex. Adultery. What about the children?
Washington D.C. has had plenty of great sexcapade stories to go around, lots of Republicans and some Democrats doing all manner of acts prohibited by Judeo-Christian law. I mean, come on now, Karl Rove used a male homosexual prostitute, Jeff Gannon, who was pretending to be a White House correspondent. So the idea that Bill is nasty as the justification for such vitriol is not credible.
Well, what about their policies, you know, what they stand for? Could that be the reason for all the attacks on them? My observation is that many politicians in and around D.C. hold similar views as the Clintons. Bill and Hillary's political viewpoints are pretty mainstream, so I don't think that's it.
What is unique about this couple? And what is unique about this couple about which, Republicans are afraid, at least politically? I mean, Karl can destroy just about anybody, Max Cleland, a triple amputee, John Kerry, a true Democratic statesman patriot, John Murtha, the closest throwback U.S. military patriot ever, and on and on, but why the extra for the Clinton's?
Consider: Hasn't the current Bush crime element demonstrated their control of information and the media? You know, paying newspaper columnists and others to get favorable press and of course my all time favorite, "embedding" the journalists with the military in Iraq. Really objective huh? And you know what goes on when the word embedding is the verb? Think about it. Could there have been an incestous relationship with our military(read executive branch) that produced DNA challenged offspring news columns that just weren't quite right? But I digress. Point being from all apparent evidence and political history, the Republican disinformation and echo chamber media campaign hasn't met with much resistance. The media has not been a match for Rove. He 's controlled the narrative in main medialand for at least 6 years.
I said all that to say this: Bill and Hillary are rock star politicians and the media cannot and will not refuse to cover them. Karl will not be able to dictate the news narrative as well. The media, I suggest, just like they act with all other celebrities, will continually cover Bill and Hillary. Bill and Hillary on TV are perfect, they are camera friendly and believable, credible. They make good TV content. Content is all the rage. And in this fantasy TV land we are currently in, the Clinton's come off as your friends. And here's the kicker, the media likes the Clinton's. The media hated Al Gore and never really tried much with Kerry, but the Clinton's, they are not only liked but admired by media. What's a Karl Rove to do? His campaign has been a steady drumbeat of slander, hyperbole, outright lies,dirty tricks and who knows what the fuck else for 15 years all because Rover knows his normal good time buddies, the bosses in media CEO-land,normally dependable echo chamber syncophants for conservative causes will not be able to resist covering the Clinton's,and the Clinton's will help shape the narrative. This is the real reason for the swiftboat fleet sailing into battle for 15 years. The Republicans are scared to political death over the most popular political couple ever. 08 is gonna' be something to behold.
posted by bluester | 12:59 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home